Woah, this looks awesome! I can totally see myself integrating this into my org-roam workflow. Thank you for sharing!
shrubble 297 days ago [-]
Thanks, I thought it was incredibly inventive and deserved to be shared.
faustlast 297 days ago [-]
I use that, it is useful for small drawings, not so much for handwriting. When using it with a tablet, maybe with some algorithm improvements, it can be as good as Inkscape.
abdullahkhalids 296 days ago [-]
Why is it not good for handwriting? Is the smoothing algorithm not good enough? Or the resolution?
BeetleB 297 days ago [-]
What's impressive is that this is not tied to Linux utilities. In fact, the author developed it in Windows!
Beijinger 297 days ago [-]
Outstanding. The only thing Emacs now lacks is a decent editor.
BeetleB 297 days ago [-]
Solved long ago with evil.
bjoli 296 days ago [-]
Emacs is in many ways a better vim than vim. I moved from vim to emacs+evil and never looked back.
setopt 287 days ago [-]
To be fair, it really depends how you use them. Vim has a better TUI while Emacs has a better GUI. Vim is generally easier to configure while Emacs is easier to extend. Vim has more packages that extend the modal editing itself (e.g. extra text objects), while Emacs has more packages that do everything else. Etc…
taneliv 297 days ago [-]
That color picker looks nifty, might want to install this just for that!
JoeyBananas 296 days ago [-]
In emacs you do things the emacs way. You will have a hard time if you try to fight it. This is doing something other than text editing, and therefore it is fighting against Emacs.
pmontra 297 days ago [-]
Better than many online tools, except for collaboration.
abdullahkhalids 296 days ago [-]
There is at least one collaborative editing tool for emacs [1]. I have never tried it, and I don't know how difficult it will be to make Easydraw buffer shared.
Also of note, artist-mode: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~tab/artist/
[1] https://code.librehq.com/qhong/crdt.el